A- de 1994
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz
✓Claimant Gerardo Antonio Cardona Ramirez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se confirma en todas sus partes el auto de la referencia por el que se rechazó la demanda presentada por los peticionarios contra una parte del Art. 6o. de la Ley 86 de 1989.
La Corte consideró que el estudio de constitucionalidad se hizo en forma íntegra y comprendió todos los argumentos pertinentes para llegar a la declaratoria de exequiblidad del precepto acusado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
- RESUELVE:
- Confirmar en todas sus partes el auto del nueve (9) de noviembre de mil novecientos noventa y cuatro (1994) del Despacho del H. Magistrado Alejandro Martínez Caballero, por el que se rechazó la demanda presentada por los ciudadanos Gerardo Antonio Cardona Ramírez, Tulio Elí Chinchilla Herrera y José del Carmén Ortega Chaparro contra una parte del artículo 6o. de la Ley 86 de 1989.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.